How to Address an Employee Behavior Problem Like Chronic Standup Lateness
Free practice. No signup.
Try it: Addressing a recurring behavior problem
Jordan is consistently 10 to 15 minutes late to the daily standup, and the rest of the team has started to notice. Address it with him directly.
You have asked Jordan to meet with you one-on-one for 10 minutes before lunch. He does not know what it is about. You are about to name a pattern he may not think is a big deal, and your job is to make clear that it is, without making it feel like a firing offense.
Say your answer out loud first if you can, then type what you said. Most strong answers are about 80 to 150 words (3 to 4 sentences).
Three minutes into your 15-minute standup, Jordan walks in. Again. Nobody says anything. But 4 people glanced at the door, then at you. That glance is a question. They want to know if you are going to do something about it.
How to address an employee behavior problem like this: name the specific pattern in private, state the concrete impact on the team, ask Jordan what is going on, and agree on a clear expectation before the conversation ends. Do not let it sit another week.
This conversation feels low-stakes, which is exactly why managers delay it. It is just lateness, right? But the real issue is not the 12 minutes. It is what those 12 minutes communicate to the other 6 people standing there. Every day you say nothing, you are teaching the team that the norm is flexible. And once that lesson lands, it is hard to unteach.
Most managers get this wrong in 1 of 2 ways. They either avoid it entirely until they are actually frustrated, then overcorrect with a tone that feels like a formal warning. Or they bring it up so gently that Jordan leaves the conversation unsure anything real was said. Neither works. The goal is a short, specific, calm conversation that leaves no ambiguity.
Practice it before you have it. The sim below puts you in the room with Jordan so you can hear how your words land before the real version matters.
How to Open Without Making It Weird
Priya, a team lead at a logistics firm in Dallas, told her manager she dreaded these conversations because she never knew how to start without it feeling like an ambush. That is a real problem. The opening sets the entire tone.
Do not open with small talk. Sitting down and asking Jordan how his weekend was before pivoting to lateness creates a whiplash that makes the conversation feel manipulative. Start with the reason you asked to meet. Something like: 'Jordan, I wanted to talk about the standup. I have noticed you have been coming in late most days this week, usually somewhere between 10 and 15 minutes after we start.' That is it. State the observation. Stop talking.
Letting silence sit for 2 or 3 seconds after you say that is not awkward. It is effective. It gives Jordan space to respond before you have already filled the room with your interpretation of what his lateness means.
What to Actually Say in the Middle of the Conversation
Once you have named the pattern, you need to do 2 things: explain the impact, and ask a genuine question.
On impact, be specific. Do not say 'it disrupts the flow.' Say something like: 'When you come in partway through, Marcus and Devon have to either repeat their updates or leave you out of the loop. Either way, it costs the team time.' That sentence has names and a consequence. Jordan can argue with your feelings. He cannot argue with what Marcus and Devon have to do.
Then ask the real question: 'Is something making it hard to be there at 9?' That question matters because sometimes there is a real answer. Jordan might be on another call that runs long every morning. He might have a standing conflict on Tuesdays and Thursdays that nobody ever formalized. You do not know until you ask, and if you skip straight to the directive, you might solve the wrong problem.
If there is a legitimate scheduling conflict, fix it. If there is not, be clear: 'I need you there at 9 when we start. Can you make that work?' Get a yes or a no. Do not accept 'I will try.' Try is not a commitment.
The 3 Mistakes Managers Make in This Conversation
First: waiting until they are angry. Marcus, a senior manager at a fintech startup in Austin, once let a similar pattern run for 6 weeks before addressing it. By the time he brought it up, his tone was clipped and Jordan felt blindsided. The earlier you have it, the calmer you can be.
Second: making it about the rule instead of the impact. 'Our standup starts at 9' is a policy lecture. It does not tell Jordan why it matters. Impact is what creates accountability. Policy creates compliance at best, resentment at worst.
Third: not ending with a clear agreement. If the conversation ends with 'okay, let's see how it goes,' nothing has changed. Before Jordan leaves the room, you both need to have said out loud what the expectation is. Write it down if that helps. Send a 1-line follow-up message that afternoon: 'Good talk. Plan is you are at standup by 9 starting tomorrow.' That message is not surveillance. It is clarity.
After the Conversation
Watch the next 5 standups. If Jordan is on time, say something brief and direct: 'Noticed you have been on time all week. Appreciate it.' Takes 4 seconds. Matters more than you think.
If the lateness continues after the conversation, that is a different situation with a different response. But most of the time, it does not continue. Most employees, when told clearly and calmly that a behavior has a real impact on real colleagues, adjust. Jordan is probably not trying to signal disrespect. He likely just never heard that it mattered. Now he will.